Retrospective cohort study highlights links between EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia and significant BMD loss.
To assess the associations between EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia and bone mineral density (BMD) loss in the past 6-16 years in community-dwelling older women from the Fracture RISk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry (FRISBEE2) study. Retrospective cohort design. Nine hundred seven community-dwelling older women constitute the baseline sample of the FRISBEE2 study. Participants had undergone an initial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) evaluation for osteoporosis in the past 6-16 years prior to the study's commencement and were re-assessed at baseline. Baseline evaluations included EWGSOP2-defined sarcopenia (handgrip strength, appendicular lean soft tissue mass/height2, 4-m gait speed) and osteoporosis assessment (total hip BMD). Baseline BMD value of each participant was compared with their own value in the previous DXA evaluation in the past 6-16 years. A BMD loss>3.0% threshold was considered as "least significant change". Adjusted multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between sarcopenia and BMD loss. Out of 907 participants, 172 (19.0%) had EWGSOP2-defined probable sarcopenia, 76 (8.4%) had confirmed sarcopenia, and 630 (73.2%) experienced significant BMD loss. After adjustment for confounders, regression models showed that BMD loss>3% in the past years was associated to twofold higher odds of probable sarcopenia (i.e., low handgrip strength) [OR=2.23 (95%CI 1.36-3.66); p=0.002]. The study found a clinically relevant association between the presence of sarcopenia and bone loss in the past 6 to 16 years in community-dwelling older women. A significant BMD loss should alert clinicians to the possible coexistence of sarcopenia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellanger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: