This analysis compares various hybrid direct air capture methods, highlighting energy use and costs, indicating a focus on adsorption efficiency.
Direct air capture (DAC) has recently gained interest as a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method to reduce atmospheric CO2. DAC is mainly studied through standalone separation technologies, especially adsorption and absorption. Hybrid DAC, combining separation technologies, is rarely investigated and is the main topic of this work. This study investigates hybrid DAC using adsorption for pre-concentration up to a few percent or tens of percent depending on the case studied and membrane separation to concentrate the CO2 stream to high purity (>90%). Adsorption regeneration by temperature swing adsorption (TSA) and vacuum thermal swing adsorption (VTSA) are compared, and VTSA regeneration achieved higher pre-concentration outlet CO2 purity (15–30%) than TSA regeneration (1–10%). Membrane separation is studied depending on inlet CO2 purity and outlet-required purity (90 or 95%), which influence the energy requirement and cost of capture. For all cases studied, the cost of capture remained high (>1700 €/tCO2) with a high energy requirement (>2 MWhe/tCO2 and >27 GJ/tCO2). The adsorption pre-concentration step accounted for the majority (>80%) of the energy requirement and cost of capture, and future work should be focused on preferentially improving adsorption step performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joannis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: