Comparative Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Autologous Serum, and Artificial Tears in Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Dry eye disease (DED) is a prevalent, complex disorder with a major impact on patients’ quality of life. While artificial tears (AT) are still the first-line treatment, their effectiveness is often limited in moderate-to-severe cases. Autologous serum (AS) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are now recognized as viable biologic treatments due to their regenerative and anti-inflammatory characteristics. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess and compare the clinical efficacy of PRP, AS, and AT in the treatment of DED, with a focus on comparative studies. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted until June 2025 for studies directly comparing PRP, AS, and AT. Eligible trials included patients with DED who reported results such as the Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). The risk of bias was calculated using ROB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Meta-analyses were carried out using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review. Both PRP and AS demonstrated greater improvements in OSDI, TBUT, and Schirmer test scores compared to AT. PRP showed a trend toward better outcomes than AS, especially in studies using injectable PRP. However, substantial heterogeneity and methodological variability were noted. Conclusions: Comparative research suggests that PRP and AS are more effective than AT in treating DED. Direct comparisons of PRP and AS yield varied results, with the route of delivery impacting outcomes. Given the heterogeneity of current protocols, further standardized, long-term trials are required to confirm the optimal delivery method and ensure safety.