Novel vaccine induces robust cross-neutralizing antibodies in chickens, suggesting improved immune response and protection against FAdV infections.
The widespread prevalence of different serotypes of fowl adenoviruses (FAdVs) has led to diverse vaccine demands, especially for subunit vaccines targeting FAdV-4 and FAdV-11, which cause hydropericardium-hepatitis syndrome (HHS) and inclusion body hepatitis (IBH), respectively. Although the Fiber protein is known to elicit robust immune protection, further exploration is needed to enhance the production of cross-neutralizing antibodies. This study utilized structural prediction and homology modeling techniques, employing domain-swapping strategy to integrate neutralizing epitope-containing amino acid sequences (274–451aa and 364–543aa) into the shaft domain of the Fiber protein. Two novel chimeric proteins were recombinantly expressed and developed into subunit vaccines: Fiber-C4/D11 and Fiber-D11/C4. Immunogenicity assessments revealed that the Fiber-C4/D11 vaccine group rapidly induced an antibody response against FAdV-11 within 7 days post-vaccination. By 28 days post-vaccination (dpv), the Fiber-C4/D11 vaccine group exhibited significantly higher levels of cross-neutralizing antibodies compared to the Fiber-D11/C4 group (p < 0.05). Challenge experiments demonstrated that both vaccines effectively alleviated clinical symptoms and prevented mortality in SPF chickens. Compared to Fiber-D11/C4, Fiber-C4/D11 significantly reduced body weight loss, liver lesions, viral titers in tissues, and viral shedding. Notably, no cross-neutralizing antibodies were detected following FAdV-4 or FAdV-11 infection, indicating a lack of natural cross-protection between the two serotypes. The chimeric vaccine addressed this gap, offering a promising multivalent approach to mitigate FAdV infections and advancing fowl adenoviral subunit vaccine strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: