Using latent diffusion models enhances beam diagnostics in particle accelerators, indicating new possibilities.
Beam loss monitors (BLMs) and beam current monitors (BCMs) are ubiquitous at particle accelerators around the world. These simple devices provide noninvasive high-level beam measurements but give no insight into the detailed 6D <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mi>x</a:mi><a:mo>,</a:mo><a:mi>y</a:mi><a:mo>,</a:mo><a:mi>z</a:mi><a:mo>,</a:mo><a:msub><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mi>x</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo>,</a:mo><a:msub><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mi>y</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo>,</a:mo><a:msub><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mi>z</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:math> beam phase-space distributions or dynamics. We show that generative conditional latent diffusion models can learn intricate patterns to solve the extreme inverse problem of mapping waveforms of tens of BLMs or BCMs along an accelerator to detailed 2D projections of a charged particle beam’s 6D phase-space density. This transformational method can be used at any particle accelerator to transform simple noninvasive devices into detailed beam phase-space diagnostics. We demonstrate this concept via multiparticle simulations of the high-intensity beam in the kilometer-long Los Alamos Neutron Science Center linear proton accelerator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scheinker et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: