This study demonstrates wave-current coupling impacts on hydrodynamic conditions in intertidal zones, suggesting design improvements for ancient forest relic protection.
Extreme weather events, such as typhoons, induce strong wave–current interactions that significantly alter nearshore hydrodynamic conditions, particularly in shallow intertidal zones. This study investigates the influence of wind speed and water depth on wave–current coupling under typhoon conditions in Shenhu Bay, southeastern China—a semi-enclosed bay that hosts multiple ancient forest relics within its intertidal zone. A two-tier numerical modeling framework was developed, comprising a regional-scale hydrodynamic model and a localized high-resolution model centered on a protective structure. Validation data were obtained from in situ field observations. Three structural scenarios were tested: fully intact, bottom-blocked, and damaged. Results indicate that wave-induced radiation stress plays a dominant role in enhancing flow velocities when wind speeds exceed 6 m/s, with wave contributions approaching 100% across all water depths. However, the linear relationship between water depth and wave contribution observed under non-typhoon conditions breaks down under typhoon forcing. A critical depth range was identified, within which wave contribution peaked before declining with further increases in depth—highlighting its potential sensitivity to storm energy. Moreover, structural simulations revealed that bottom-blocked devices, although seemingly more enclosed, may be vulnerable to vertical pressure loading due to insufficient water exchange. In contrast, perforated designs facilitate an internal–external hydrodynamic balance, thereby enhancing protective effect. This study provides both theoretical and practical insights into intertidal structure design and paleo-heritage conservation under extreme hydrodynamic stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: