Narrative review highlights selective motor restriction and decision-making tools in adult trauma patients.
The prehospital motor restriction of the cervical and spinal column in trauma patients remains a highly debated topic, with significant variability in clinical practice. With the present study, we aimed to conduct a narrative review of the literature on cervical and spinal motor restriction in prehospital settings, identifying devices used, clinical decision-making tools, and potential complications. A structured search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, Web of Science), including studies on adult trauma patients (≥16 years) with suspected spinal injury in prehospital settings. Screening was performed using Rayyan QCRI, and methodological quality was assessed via the Kmet checklist. A total of 28 studies were included. Evidence highlights that immobilization should not be applied routinely but guided by clinical risk and context. The use of validated protocols, selective motor restriction, and alternative devices (e.g., vacuum mattresses, self-extrication) may improve outcomes and reduce complications. High-fidelity simulation training and clinical audits are recommended to enhance decision-making and protocol adherence in spinal trauma management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gheri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: