Conceptual framework enhances intellectual maturity and technological sovereignty in industrial ecosystems, indicating new research directions.
Aim. The work aimed to construct a scientifically sound and practically applicable terminological platform for strategic management of the intellectual maturity of industrial ecosystems as a key condition for achieving technological sovereignty and industrial leadership of Russia in the context of Industry 6.0. Objectives. The work seeks to conceptualize the notions of “intellectual maturity”, “intellectual resilience”, “cognitive flexibility”, ‘hyperconnectivity’, and “digital emotional intelligence” in relation to digital and industrial ecosystems; to perform critical analysis of existing theoretical and practical approaches to maturity assessment; to develop grounds for constructing a unified research vocabulary that ensures the cognitive integrity of management decisions. Methods. The study employed the systemic and cognitive approaches using methods of conceptual analysis, comparative terminological examination, elemental structuring of concepts, and principles of logical and semantic modeling. The provisions of the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation and modern theories of industrial ecosystem management in the era of Industry 6.0 are taken into account. Results. The author’s interpretation of the key categories that determine the intellectual maturity of ecosystems is substantiated. The relationship between cognitive cooperation, knowledge management architecture and strategic development of industrial structures is established. The work identifies the levels of intellectual maturity and proposes the indicators for its assessment. The authors reveal the role of intellectual maturity as a factor of cognitive autonomy and a generator of technological sovereignty. Conclusions. The developed conceptual framework is a basis for the formalization and standardization of approaches to the intellectualization of industrial ecosystems, provides a conceptual platform for the subsequent institutionalization of strategic management in the logic of cognitive-centric models. The results open up new opportunities for research in the field of intellectual transformation of industry and the formation of cognitive sovereignty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Глухов et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: