Animal model reveals enhanced survival time in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis, suggesting that modifications may aid future research.
Objective This study aimed to develop an animal model that closely replicates the clinical features of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), thereby providing a supportive platform for ongoing NEC research. Methods 36 two-week-old neonatal suckling rabbits were randomly assigned to three groups: normal group (Group A, n = 12), traditional group (Group B, n = 12), and modified group (Group C, n = 12). Daily monitoring of general condition, post-modeling survival rate, and survival time was conducted in neonatal rabbits. Histopathological assessment of intestinal morphology was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining, with scoring conducted to evaluate modeling success. Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), occludin, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), and zonulin were quantified using ELISA. Protein expression levels of occludin and ZO-1 in intestinal tissues were analyzed via Western blot. Results Modified group exhibited significantly higher survival rates and prolonged survival time compared to traditional group (p < 0.05). Both model groups demonstrated elevated serum levels of CRP, TNF-α, IL-10, along with reduced concentrations of occluding, ZO-1 and zonulin when compared to normal group (p < 0.05). Similarly, intestinal expression levels of occludin and ZO-1 were significantly lower in both model groups relative to control (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between model groups in these parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusion Our study successfully established a novel neonatal rabbit model of NEC with prolonged survival time by refining conventional modeling methodologies, thereby providing a new platform for investigating NEC pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: