This cross-sectional study evaluates patient satisfaction with telemedicine services in Qassim, highlighting accessibility and communication efficiency.
Telemedicine has emerged as a vital component of healthcare delivery, especially in regions like Qassim, characterized by geographical challenges. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate patients' satisfaction with telemedicine services in the Qassim Region, considering its unique demographics and healthcare landscape. By employing a quantitative research approach and a cross-sectional survey design, data was collected to assess various aspects of patient satisfaction, including service quality, accessibility, and communication efficiency. A sample size of approximately 352 patients was targeted using a convenience sampling method. Questionnaires were used to collect the data. Data analysis involved utilizing SPSS to summarize findings and identify significant patterns. the study reported that post-COVID-19, 50.34% of participants started using telemedicine, highlighting its rapid adoption during the pandemic. The primary use was for medical consultations (36.63%), emphasizing its role in routine healthcare. A major consensus (82.5%) saw telemedicine as a time-saver. It's also viewed as an essential component of patient care (82.2% agree or strongly agree) and necessary in rural and underserved areas (83.8% agreement). Regarding factors enhancing telemedicine experience, the most valued aspect is saving waiting times (22.13%), while the least influential factor was conducting laboratory tests through telemedicine (7.51%). Moreover, the study showed diverse satisfaction levels, with the majority feeling 'Satisfied' (46.23%) or 'Very satisfied' (29.80%). These findings collectively indicate the growing significance and acceptance of telemedicine, particularly in efficiency, patient care, and accessibility, with certain demographic factors influencing experience and satisfaction levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pasha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: