Descriptive mixed-methods analysis shows positive coping strategies enhance subjective well-being in LGBTQIA+ communities, emphasizing resilience amidst challenges.
This study investigates the coping mechanisms and subjective well-being of LGBTQIA+ individuals in Northern Philippines aiming to identify the resiliency of LGBTQIA+ individuals amid facing life challenges in relation to their gender. Utilizing a descriptive mixed-methods approach with a purposive sample of adult LGBTQIA+ individuals, the study survey as an approach in gathering quantitative data while thematic analysis was used in organizing qualitative data. The findings reveal that participants predominantly employ positive coping mechanisms, with the highest mean scores observed for “using humor to cope with difficult situations” and “focusing on strengths and resilience. Notably, professional mental health support and substance use were the least utilized coping mechanisms. In terms of subjective well-being, respondents generally reported a positive outlook and high satisfaction across most life aspects. A strong sense of purpose and happiness with work ability, optimism about the future and satisfaction with personal achievements scored highest. High contentment was also reported for personal and family life, friendships, relationships, and self-worth. Recommendations from LGBTQIA+ teachers highlight the critical need for LGBTQIA+-friendly school environments and the eradication of sexism and gender bias in workplaces. Participants also emphasized the importance of merit-based evaluation and equal access to growth and professional development. Overall, the study underscores the remarkable resilience and strong community ties within the LGBTQIA+ community in Northern Philippines. Despite experiencing considerable subjective well-being in many life domains, persistent challenges related to mental health, access to services, and societal discrimination highlight the ongoing need for legal protection and increased gender awareness to foster genuinely inclusive and supportive working environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subrino et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: