Cross-sectional study compares dual-task performance between older adults with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, suggesting significant cognitive deficits in the latter group.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and prediabetes (PreDM) are common among older adults and are associated with cognitive and physical impairments. Dual-task testing, which combines motor and cognitive tasks, reflects real-world functional ability. However, comparisons of dual-task performance between older adults with T2DM and PreDM are limited. This study aimed to compare cognitive and motor dual-task performance and related physical and cognitive parameters in older adults with T2DM and PreDM. This cross-sectional study included 46 older adults (23 T2DM and 23 PreDM), all aged ≥ 65 years. Dual-task performance was assessed using the timed up and go test under motor (TUG-Motor) and cognitive (TUG-Cog) conditions. Fatigue was measured by a Visual Analogue Scale; handgrip strength was measured with a dynamometer; physical performance was evaluated via the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); and cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Compared to the PreDM group, the T2DM group had significantly poorer dual-task cognitive performance (TUG-Cog) ( P = .001)and higher fatigue ( P = .004). The T2DM group also had lower Mini-Mental State Examination ( P = .04) scores and lower SPPB scores ( P = .02). There was no significant difference in TUG-Motor time ( P = .129). In both groups, TUG-Motor time strongly correlated with SPPB (T2DM, r = -.720; PreDM, r = -.727) and TUG-Cog time moderately correlated with SPPB (T2DM, r = -.596; PreDM, r = -.517) ( P < .01 for all). Dual-task performance is closely linked to physical function in older adults with T2DM and PreDM. Older adults with T2DM showed greater deficits in dual-task cognition, cognitive function, and physical performance than those with PreDM. Early interventions to improve dual-task ability may help preserve independence and reduce fall risk in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mermerkaya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: