This analysis demonstrates significant cost efficiency improvements in raw material inventory management, suggesting better adaptability through method integration.
General background: Inventory control is a critical component in the printing industry, where efficiency and accuracy directly affect production continuity and cost management. Specific background: PT XYZ, a printing and packaging company using an offset-based make-to-order system, faces recurring issues of overstock and inefficiency due to the absence of systematic inventory prioritization and stock regulation. Knowledge gap: Prior studies confirm the utility of ABC Analysis and Min-Max Stock methods, but limited research evaluates their combined application in the context of printing industries with fluctuating demand. Aims: This study aims to optimize raw material inventory control of paper and ink through the integration of ABC Analysis and Min-Max Stock methods. Results: Findings reveal that four types of paper and three types of ink fall under category A, and applying Min-Max Stock significantly reduced order frequency and safety stock, achieving cost savings up to 73% for paper and 30% for ink compared to the company’s conventional method. Novelty: The study demonstrates that combining both methods yields higher efficiency and adaptability than using either approach in isolation. Implications: This integrated approach offers strategic guidance for printing companies to achieve sustainable, structured, and cost-effective inventory management. Highlights: Significant cost savings achieved (up to 73% for paper, 30% for ink). Integration of ABC and Min-Max methods ensures efficient and adaptive control. Provides strategic guidance for sustainable inventory management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pradinain et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: