This observational analysis examines posture changes and their impact on dynamic cerebral autoregulation, suggesting significant effects on critical closing pressure and resistance-area product.
Introduction Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is affected by posture changes, but there is a paucity of research examining the effect of posture on dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). The step responses of critical closing pressure (CrCP) and resistance area product (RAP) obtained from the cerebral blood velocity (CBv) signal can reflect the changes in dCA, enabling exploration of dCA changes in supine, sitting and upright postures. Methods In 22 participants (11 males, aged 30.2 ± 14.3 years), two recordings were made for each posture, corresponding to supine, sitting, and standing. Blood pressure (BP, Finometer), MCAv and PCAv (transcranial Doppler ultrasound), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 , capnography) and heart rate (ECG) were continuously recorded. CrCP and RAP were obtained for each cardiac cycle, and the step responses of CBv (SRV MCA/PCA ), CrCP (SRV CrCP ), and RAP (SRV RAP ), for both arteries, were calculated after subcomponent and transfer function analysis. Results Moving from supine to sitting, and then standing, led to reductions in mean MCAv ( p < 0.001), PCAv ( p = 0.037), BP ( p < 0.001) and EtCO 2 ( p < 0.001), accompanied by changes in SRV MCA ( p = 0.002), but not in SRV PCA ( p = 0.78). For both arteries, SRV RAP and SRV CrCP reflected changes in posture (both p < 0.001). Conclusion Posture changes can significantly affect the step responses of MCAv, CrCP, and RAP. The interaction between posture and EtCO 2 from the perspective of the CrCP and RAP step responses needs further exploration in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: