Cross-sectional analysis reveals professional self-concept affects turnover intention and quality of life among psychiatric nurses, suggesting targeted management interventions.
Background: Nurses working in psychiatric wards face unique challenges compared to other departments, such as job dissatisfaction and turnover, which require special attention from management. A positive professional self-concept can play a crucial role in enhancing adaptability in the high-stress nursing environment. Objective: The research team aimed to investigate the relationship between professional self-concept and the tendency to leave the profession and professional quality of life among psychiatric nurses. Design: This was a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study. Setting: The study was conducted on 219 nurses employed at Razi Educational and Treatment Center in Tehran in 2023. The sample was selected using a census method. Main outcome measures: Data collection tools included a demographic information questionnaire, Kevin's Professional Self-Concept Questionnaire, Hinshaw's Turnover Intention Questionnaire, and Stamm's Professional Quality of Life Questionnaire. The results were analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Results: The average professional self-concept score of the nurses was 25.37±69.22. The tendency to leave the job, compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary trauma stress were at moderate levels. Professional self-concept and satisfaction with received salary were predictors of the tendency to leave the job. Professional self-concept was the only predictor of compassion satisfaction and secondary trauma stress. Burnout was predicted by both professional self-concept and satisfaction with salary. Conclusions: It is recommended that managers and policymakers develop programs to enhance professional self-concept and increase the salary of nurses working in psychiatric departments to reduce their tendency to leave the profession and improve their professional quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javanbakht et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: