Content analysis reveals how Kurdish media coverage shaped perceptions of ISIS, suggesting underlying implications. The study employs framing theory and agenda-setting model to explore these dynamics.
Media is a powerful tool for disseminating information and shaping public perception. It also serves as a strategic instrument for governments and private entities to communicate their narratives. Engaging with media requires caution and expertise to avoid inadvertently spreading fear—especially in the context of terrorism. The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS, also known as ISIL) has been particularly adept at leveraging media to assert dominance, spread its ideology, and manipulate public perception. Kurdistan, an autonomous region in Northern Iraq, faced unique challenges in reporting on ISIS due to its proximity to occupied territories. In this complex media landscape, Kurdish outlets struggled to cover the terrorist group effectively, sometimes inadvertently amplifying its message. This phenomenon coincided with a surge in Kurdish recruits joining ISIS, leading to the formation of a Kurdish faction within the organization. Using Framing Theory and the Agenda-Setting Model, this research employs content analysis to examine how Kurdish media portrayed ISIS. By analyzing news coverage from Kurdish news channels such as (Rudaw, NRT, K24, Kurdsat News, Spede and Payam) between June 2014 to June 218, this study investigates whether Kurdish media unintentionally contributed to the visibility or perceived legitimacy of ISIS. The findings will shed light on the unintended consequences of terrorism reporting and its role in shaping public narratives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: