Analysis of roof movement and pressure behavior in shallow coal seams, revealing instability patterns.
This paper focuses on the issues of roof movement and ground pressure behavior in large-height mining extraction of shallow coal seams. By adopting a combined method of theoretical analysis and physical simulation experiments, it establishes a mechanical model for the rotational subsidence of key blocks and a physical simulation test model to conduct stability analysis on the rotational subsidence of key blocks, thereby revealing the characteristics and laws of roof movement. The findings indicate that the horizontal thrust during the rotational subsidence of key blocks increases non-linearly with the rotation angle, exhibiting a higher growth rate when the block size coefficient is less than 0.5. Two modes of instability—sliding and deformation—are observed for key blocks. To prevent sliding instability, the block size coefficient should be maintained below 0.75; however, sliding instability is likely to occur when the rotation angle exceeds 10°. Conversely, smaller rotation angles and larger block size coefficients reduce the likelihood of deformation instability. The reasonable working resistance of the support decreases with the increase in the rotation angle (it decreases sharply when the rotation angle exceeds 10°) and increases with the increase in the block size coefficient. Physical simulation indicates that roof movement is divided into three stages: immediate roof collapse, stratified fracturing and instability of the basic roof, and periodic fracturing of the basic roof. An increase in mining height accelerates the instability of the immediate roof, enlarges the opening of through-layer fissures, shortens the step distance of mining pressure, and heightens the risk of sudden pressure. The research results provide theoretical guidance for the safe and efficient mining with large mining height in shallow coal seams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: