Field test assesses bat speed accuracy using a mounted sensor in elite female cricketers, suggesting effective measurement method.
Currently, there are no validated field-based measures of bat speed in cricket. This study sought to validate a baseball bat-mounted sensor for use in cricketers. Nine professional female cricketers (19.9 ± 2.8 years, 166.6 ± 4.8 cm, 68.7 ± 8.6 kg) performed 40 swings across four shot types (Cut, Drive, Pull, Slog-Sweep). Bat speed from a bat-mounted sensor was compared to optical motion capture (MoCap). Bat speed differed between shot types and ranged from 52.8 to 87.9 km/h. Device accuracy was determined by Bland-Altman bias and precision. The Drive shot had the smallest bias (−1.0 km/h; 1.4%), followed by the Slog-Sweep (2.0 km/h; 2.7%), Pull (2.0 km/h; 2.8%) then Cut shot, (2.5 km/h; 3.9%). The Cut shot had the greatest precision (2.7 km/h; 4.1%), followed by Pull (3.4 km/h; 4.7%), Slog-Sweep (4.0 km/h; 5.3%) and Drive (4.4 km/h; 6.3%). Kendall's tau analysis showed that proportional errors increased with higher bat speeds for all shots except Pull, (p < 0.05). The evidence supports use of the sensor for bat speed among female cricket players for all shots between speeds of 52.8–87.9 km/h. Caution is warranted for additional shot types, and speeds outside the explored range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freeston et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: