Systematic review evaluates pain reduction and mobility improvements in TMD with autogenous injections, suggesting PRP may be superior.
Background/Objectives: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a heterogeneous group of musculoskeletal conditions affecting the temporomandibular joints and masticatory muscles. In recent years, autogenous injections have been investigated as minimally invasive therapeutic options to alleviate pain and improve function. However, the clinical effectiveness of such therapies across different TMD phenotypes remains uncertain. Methods: Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for articles published between January 2015 and May 2025. Studies involving intra-articular or intra-muscular autogenous injections in TMD patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Six were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven were non-randomized clinical studies. Ten studies evaluated intra-articular conditions such as disc displacement or Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis, while three focused on myofascial pain. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) was the most frequently investigated agent. Most studies reported statistically significant reductions in pain and improvements in mandibular mobility following autogenous injections, with PRP generally outperforming comparators such as hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, or saline. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: All PRP and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) injection protocols reviewed were effective in reducing pain and improving mobility in patients with TMD. However, differences in protocols and follow-up times prevented a meta-analysis from being conducted. More standardized RCTs are needed to determine clear clinical guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orzeszek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: