A bibliometric analysis of LC 3 cement was performed in the following databases: Scopus, Science Direct and Web of Science using combinations of words: "LC 3 ", "cement", "Limestone calcined clay", "concrete", "mortar" and "paste". The countries with the highest number of publications were India (48), China (37), United States (26) and Switzerland (22). Brazil published only 5 articles, without any international co-authorship. In the scientific part, it was identified that the optimum calcination temperature of clay is between 600 and 850 °C. Limestone acts as a filler (filling, nucleation and dilution), with the nucleation of hydration products being more prominent, accelerating the alite (C 3 S) reaction, which increases the formation of C-S-H. For low kaolinite content (27%), the optimum clay/limestone ratio would be 2:1, while for clays with high kaolinite content (80%), this ratio should be 1:2.5. In addition to the traditional reactions of Portland cement, three main reactions occur in LC 3 systems: pozzolanic reaction between the silicoaluminate of metakaolin and the CH from the cement hydration, forming C-S-H and C-A-S-H (hydrated calcium aluminosilicate), which contribute to strength and void filling; reaction between the alumina of C 3 A, the CaCO 3 of limestone and CH, forming Mc and Hc, which leaves more sulphates available for the formation of ettringite; and reaction between the aluminates of metakaolin and the CaCO 3 of limestone, forming additional Mc and Hc. As a result, matrices with a lower corrosion rate are obtained in environments at risk of chlorides and sulphates in LC 3 concrete. It is concluded that LC 3 is a good binder from a technical and environmental point of view. It has great potential for use in civil construction, however, further studies are still needed on: effects of curing, adjustments to sulphate content, durability and extreme situations of high temperatures (fire).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almada et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: