Validated method quantifies parabens in urine samples, indicating health risks in Southern Brazil.
This study describes a method for the simultaneous parabens (PBs) quantification in 100 urine volunteers residing in Southern Brazil, using a three-step solid-phase extraction (SPE) with hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB®) sorbent, with subsequent analysis by liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS-MS). This validated approach simplifies the standard five-step SPE process by eliminating the conditioning and equilibration steps. Target analytes included methylparaben (MeP), ethylparaben (EtP), propylparaben (PrP) and butylparaben (BuP). Urine samples (1 mL) were hydrolyzed with β-glucuronidase acid solution, mixed with deuterated internal standards, and subjected to SPE. Analysis was performed using an UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm), with a 6.5-min chromatographic run. Intra-assay precision was 2.8-11.6%, inter-assay precision was 0.7-7.1%, and accuracy was 94.8-111.8%. Extraction yields varied from 92.31-109.4%, with matrix effects ranging from -13.7 to -2.8. PBs were measured in all urine samples. A concerning proportion of 3% of the individuals exceeded the recommended acceptable daily intake (ADI) for PrP, indicating a potential health risk (hazard quotient ≥ 1.0). These findings provide valuable insights into human exposure to PBs in Southern Brazil, highlighting the need for further research to assess potential health risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loredo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: