PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Molecular Biomedicine12 citationsOpen Access

The m6A modification in cancer: roles, implications, and its potential in therapy

View Full Paper
YWYuyao WeiYWYang WuCZChun Zhang

Key Points

  • m6A modification influences gene expression patterns in cancer cells, driving malignant progression and therapeutic resistance.
  • The review examines m6A's critical functions, including its roles in cancer-related networks, hallmarks, and stem cells.
  • We analyze the implications of m6A dysregulation, emphasizing its diagnostic potential and value in predicting treatment responses.
  • The study discusses opportunities for using m6A modification in treatment strategies, including m6A inhibitors and personalized medicine.

Abstract

Abstract N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) serves as the dominant epitranscriptomic mark within eukaryotic mRNA transcripts, exerting pivotal regulatory functions in modulating mRNA structural integrity, translational efficiency, and splicing, thereby influencing gene expression patterns in cancer cells. m 6 A modification is recognized as a principal epigenetic determinant in driving malignant progression and fostering therapeutic resistance, making it crucial for advancing precision oncology. This review begins with a brief introduction to m 6 A modification, with a particular focus on its dynamic variability in distinct malignancies and clinical staging scenarios. Moreover, we underscore the critical functions of m 6 A methylation in cancer biology, including cancer-related molecular networks, cancer hallmarks, cancer stem cells, and the tumor microenvironment. We further outline the implications of m 6 A dysregulation in cancer, emphasizing the diagnostic potential of m 6 A regulators, the prognostic value of m 6 A, and the role of m 6 A in treatment resistance. Additionally, we analyze the potential of m 6 A modification in cancer therapy, encompassing the use of m 6 A inhibitors, combinations with existing cancer therapies, and personalized medicine approaches. Finally, we dissect the current limitations and future directions in m 6 A modification research, directing resources toward the development of high-throughput platforms for the dynamic monitoring of m 6 A modification in living systems. Overall, this review reinforces the central significance of m 6 A modification in cancer biology, emphasizing its transformative capacity to reshape cancer diagnostic paradigms and therapeutic intervention strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wei et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473bb31b076d99fa6c9a2https://doi.org/10.1186/s43556-025-00314-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cholecystitis and cholangiocarcinoma: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2WTAP‐induced N6 ‐methyladenosine of PD‐L1 blocked T‐cell‐mediated antitumor activity under hypoxia in colorectal cancer2024 · 22 citations
  3. 3Rethinking m6A Readers, Writers, and Erasers2017 · 1,255 citations
  4. 4Zc3h13 Regulates Nuclear RNA m6A Methylation and Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal2018 · 1,008 citations
  5. 5The feedback loop of METTL14 and USP38 regulates cell migration, invasion and EMT as well as metastasis in bladder cancer2022 · 32 citations