Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 23, 2025Journal of Stomatological Medicine

Evaluation of dental occlusion registration techniques: impact on prosthetic treatment outcomes in contemporary dental practice

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VOVadim OineagraNGNatalia GrozaOSOleg Solomon

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This observational analysis compares occlusography methods, revealing implications for treating occlusal anomalies.

Key Points

  • The study shows that combining classical and modern occlusography techniques can optimize prosthetic treatment outcomes.
  • Patients underwent treatment using both conventional occlusography methods and digital techniques, providing insights on their effectiveness.
  • Conventional methods like articulation paper still offer significant advantages when diagnosing occlusal anomalies alongside digital techniques.
  • The clinical algorithm developed guides effective occlusal contact recording based on individual patient needs.

Cite This Study

Oineagra et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4757f31b076d99fa6cde2https://doi.org/10.53530/1857-1328.25.1.05
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How to register static occlusion – Correlation of contemporary techniques2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2From Paper to Pixels—A Narrative Review of Occlusal Analysis2026
  3. 3Accuracy of interocclusal record established by different occlusal scans2024
  4. 4Digital Protocol to Record Occlusal Analysis in Prosthodontics: A Pilot Study2024 · 14 citations
  5. 5Accuracy of articulating paper vs intraoral scanner in occlusal contact analysis: A scoping review2025