This article explores migrant labour dynamics in postcolonial India, highlighting structural exclusion and reflexivity.
This article critically engages with the theoretical challenges of conceptualising the migrant subject in postcolonial India by tracing different traditions of duality existing in the postcolonial development discourse. Through a synthesis of Kalyan Sanyal’s theorisation of postcolonial capitalism and Margaret Archer’s framework of critical realism, the paper describes the persistence of structural exclusion despite developmental inclusion and the everyday agency of the migrant worker. Sanyal’s capital–non-capital complex and the figure of the wasteland are deployed to rethink the logic of primitive accumulation and its reversal, while Archer’s notion of reflexivity is introduced to reinstate the subjective agency of the flux migrant — an individual oscillating between exclusion and aspiration. The article introduces two key conceptual interventions: flux migrants and reflexivity traps, offering a process-based model to account for migration instability in the absence of economic absorption. This model re-politicises the subject and attends to the relational ontology of late capitalist exclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esha dey (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: