Assessment of accuracy with large language models in FNAC diagnosis, revealing challenges in sensitivity and agreement.
Role of Large language models (LLMs) in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) image analysis remain uncertain. We evaluated two LLMs - Chat GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic) on 63 thyroid FNAC cases, each represented by eight microscopic images (Pap and MGG, 10x/40x), using generic and structured prompts. Structured prompts improved Bethesda concordance and near-match rates but inter-rater agreement remained poor (κ ≤ 0.09). Specificity reached 100% with structured prompts, but sensitivity dropped to ≤11.8% and misclassification persisted. LLMs show potential, but domain-specific training and validation are necessary for clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: