Innovative UAV methods reveal reduced sediment loss in seagrass-enhanced dunes versus sand-only dunes, suggesting cost-effective coastal protection.
In this paper, an innovative method consisting of the construction of an artificial dune reinforced with a composite made by combining sand and seagrass wrack is presented. The performance of this reinforced dune is compared with sand-only dunes, built at the same time, through data collected during 17 field campaigns (covering a period of one year) carried out with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), whose images allow digital elevation models (DEMs) to be built. The results show that, in the medium term, while the sand-only dunes lose much of their volume (up to 25% of the refilled sediment), the reinforced dune only reduces its volume by around 1.4%. In addition, the cross-shore and longitudinal profiles extracted from the DEMs of the dunes indicate that sand-only dunes greatly reduce the elevation of their crests, while the profile of the reinforced dune remains almost unchanged. This suggests that the addition of seagrass wrack can greatly contribute to increasing the resilience of restored dunes and the time between re-fillings, therefore reducing beach protection costs. However, as the results are based on a single wrack–sand dune and have not been replicated, they should be treated with caution. At the same time, this work illustrates how UAVs can acquire the data needed to map coastal restoration works in a fast and economical way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gràcia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: