Compares UAV lidar and SfM photogrammetry for coastal monitoring, suggesting both methods are effective for tracking changes.
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly used for high-resolution coastal monitoring. This study compares two widely used approaches for deriving digital elevation models (DEMs) from eight repeat UAV surveys (coacquired lidar + red–green–blue [RGB] in the same flight): (1) UAV lidar and (2) structure-from-motion photogrammetry (SfM) based on RGB imagery. A total of 16 DEMs (8 field campaigns in both 2022 and 2023) acquired with a DJI Matrice 300 real-time kinematic drone equipped with a Zenmuse L1 sensor over a 1-km dune–beach system in Mrzeżyno, southern Baltic coast (Poland). Using an automated transect-based workflow (895 cross-shore profiles), shoreline position, beach and dune widths, elevations, slopes, and volumetric change were extracted and related to tide-gauge–based hydrometeorological conditions using deep neural networks and complementary driver-consistency analyses. Both approaches captured consistent temporal trends and converged on the same dominant environmental drivers, with storm activity (event count and duration) together with wave and sea-level conditions explaining most of the observed variability. Differences were largest over water surfaces and locally within vegetation-affected dune areas, where lidar produced fewer artifacts. Despite these local deviations, the net beach + dune volume change between the first and last survey differed by only 0.48% between lidar and SfM, indicating that SfM can provide comparable coastal-change information for many monitoring tasks when survey geometry and quality control are carefully managed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakub Śledziowski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: