This study demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning models for tool wear monitoring, highlighting improvements through signal fusion and 1D-CNN approaches.
Tool wear is a major challenge in sheet-metal forming, as it directly affects product quality and process stability. Reliable monitoring of tool-wear conditions is therefore essential, yet it remains challenging due to limited data availability and uncertainties in manufacturing conditions. To this end, this study evaluates different strategies for developing robust machine learning models under data scarcity for fluctuating manufacturing conditions: a 1D-CNN using time-series data (baseline model), a 1D-CNN with signal fusion of force and acceleration signals, and a 2D-CNN based on Gramian Angular Field (GAF) transformation. Experiments are conducted using inline data from a blanking process with varying material thicknesses and varying availability of training data. The results show that the fusion model achieved the highest improvement (up to 93.2% with the least training data) compared to the baseline model (78.3%). While the average accuracy of the 2D-CNN was comparable to that of the baseline model, its performance was more consistent, with a reduced standard deviation of 5.4% compared to 9.2%. The findings underscore the benefits of sensor fusion and structured signal representation in enhancing classification robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hofmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: