Observational analysis reveals higher post-traumatic stress symptoms and anger in firefighters, indicating needs for tailored mental health interventions.
Due to the burdens of critical operations, firefighters are at occupational risk of developing mental health problems such as post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) or anger. In this study, we assessed the impact of a firefighting operation with two fatalities and eleven injuries among colleagues on the mental health of those involved. Aims: The study hypothesizes that firefighters who were acquainted with the wounded or deceased show more PTSS and score higher on the STAXI-2 State Anger, Anger Expression-In/Out, and Anger Control-In/Out compared to those who were not. The second hypothesis assumes that the deployed group shows more PTSS and scores higher on the STAXI-2 State Anger, Anger Expression-In/Out, and Anger Control-In/Out compared to the grouping of non-deployed colleagues. Methods: A total of N = 138 firefighters were included, of which n = 32 were deployed and n = 106 were not (n = 26 acquainted with wounded or injured; n = 107 not acquainted with wounded or injured; n = 5 not specified). Both groups completed a standardized questionnaire voluntarily and after providing written informed consent ten months after the incident. The questionnaire consisted of the Posttraumatic Stress Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the State-Trait Anger Inventory (STAXI-2) questionnaire. Results: Firefighters who knew the injured or deceased colleagues had significantly higher PTSS [T(23.7) = −2.5; p = 0.019; d = 0.67; 95% CI = (−10.8, −1.0)], state anger [T(74.2) = 2.4; p = 0.021; d = 0.41; 95% CI = (0.2, 2.0)], and anger control scores [T(124) = −2.7; p = 0.008; d = 0.71; 95% CI = (−5.9, −0.9)]. In addition, the deployed group showed higher anger control [T(134) = 2.0; p = 0.046; d = 0.42; 95% CI = (0.0, 4.2)] and outward anger expression [T(73.5) = −2.2; p = 0.032; d = 0.40; 95% CI = (−2.3, −0.1)] scores compared to their non-deployed colleagues. Discussion: Future psychological pre- and post-deployment interventions should place more focus on the increased vulnerability of those acquainted with wounded or deceased colleagues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Görlich et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: