Comparative analysis reveals diverse national policies in ITCS among BRICS countries, indicating complementary partnerships as a strategic resource.
In the context of growing global geopolitical competition and the transformation of the world order, the task of strengthening collective sovereignty in the information and telecommunications sphere (ITCS) is becoming critically important for BRICS. This article addresses the scientific problem of harmonizing the diverse national policies of Russia’s key partner countries on integration in the information and telecommunications sphere (ITCS). The theoretical basis of the study is the concepts of digital sovereignty developed in the works of V.A. Nikonov and co-authors, and T. Day’s theories of state sectoral policy. The aim is to justify the strategy of com-plementary partnership as the most optimal approach to cooperation in conditions of heterogeneity. The meth-odology is based on a comparative analysis of four reference models – from China, India, Brazil, and South Africa – in accordance with A. Lijphart’s approach. The scientific novelty lies in identifying the contradiction be-tween the commonality of the association’s strategic goals and the diversity of its members’ approaches, as well as in conceptualizing synergistic interaction as a mechanism for resolving this contradiction. The analysis found that direct borrowing or unification of policies is difficult to implement. The optimal solution is a flexible combination of the unique strengths of each national model. The findings of the study confirm that diversity of approaches should be viewed not as a barrier, but as a strategic resource for building a sustainable system of collective digital sovereignty for BRICS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Yu. Rovchak (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: