Systematic review and meta-analysis indicates hormone therapy enhances overall survival and progression-free survival in prostate cancer post-surgery.
Background Salvage radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for non‐metastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), yet the efficacy of concurrent hormone therapy remains debated. This systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluates the impact of adding hormone therapy to adjuvant or salvage RT on key survival outcomes. Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries for randomized phase 2 or 3 trials comparing RT alone versus RT with hormone therapy (anti‐androgens or androgen deprivation therapy) in patients undergoing RP. A random‐effects meta‐analysis with the inverse variance method was performed for overall survival (OS), metastasis‐free survival (MFS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) after extracting the corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Four trials with generally low risk of bias were identified. Pooled HRs were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72–0.99) for OS, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70–0.96) for MFS, and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.51–0.66) for PFS, favoring hormone therapy. Following a sensitivity analysis that excluded the results of one of the four trials, the significance for OS was no longer observed. Conclusion Hormone therapy with post‐RP RT significantly improves OS, MFS, and PFS in prostate cancer patients. Although the benefit in OS appears less robust, these findings support the significant role of hormone therapy in delaying disease progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: