This algorithm improves cloud detection accuracy in regions with haze pollution, indicating robustness against misjudgments.
Cloud detection is an indispensable step in satellite remote sensing of cloud properties and objects under the influence of cloud occlusion. Nevertheless, interfering targets such as snow and haze pollution are easily misjudged as clouds for most of the current algorithms. Hence, a robust cloud detection algorithm is urgently needed, especially for regions with high latitudes or severe air pollution. This paper demonstrated that the passive satellite detector Advanced Geosynchronous Radiation Imager (AGRI) onboard the FY-4A satellite has a great possibility to misjudge the dense aerosols in haze pollution as clouds during the daytime, and constructed an algorithm based on the spectral information of the AGRI’s 14 bands with a concise and high-speed calculation. This study adjusted the previously proposed cloud mask rectification algorithm of Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), rectified the MODIS cloud detection result, and used it as the accurate cloud mask data. The algorithm was constructed based on adjusted Fisher discrimination analysis (AFDA) and spectral spatial variability (SSV) methods over four different underlying surfaces (land, desert, snow, and water) and two seasons (summer and winter). This algorithm divides the identification into two steps to screen the confident cloud clusters and broken clouds, which are not easy to recognize, respectively. In the first step, channels with obvious differences in cloudy and cloud-free areas were selected, and AFDA was utilized to build a weighted sum formula across the normalized spectral data of the selected bands. This step transforms the traditional dynamic-threshold test on multiple bands into a simple test of the calculated summation value. In the second step, SSV was used to capture the broken clouds by calculating the standard deviation (STD) of spectra in every 3 × 3-pixel window to quantify the spectral homogeneity within a small scale. To assess the algorithm’s spatial and temporal generalizability, two evaluations were conducted: one examining four key regions and another assessing three different moments on a certain day in East China. The results showed that the algorithm has an excellent accuracy across four different underlying surfaces, insusceptible to the main interferences such as haze and snow, and shows a strong detection capability for broken clouds. This algorithm enables widespread application to different regions and times of day, with a low calculation complexity, indicating that a new method satisfying the requirements of fast and robust cloud detection can be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: