Retrospective cohort analysis shows composite indices predict ICU admission and mortality, indicating critical care improvement.
Aims: Given that acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability, the early identification of reliable prognostic markers is essential. This study evaluates the prognostic value of composite inflammatory and nutritional indices, including the monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR), Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission and one-year mortality following AIS. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 496 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AIS. Clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and outcomes were retrospectively retrieved. The prognostic significance of selected inflammatory indices [MHR, SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)] and nutritional indices (PNI and CONUT) was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, along with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Higher SII and CONUT scores and lower PNI values were significantly associated with both ICU admission and one-year mortality. In multivariate analysis, CONUT and MHR emerged as independent predictors of one-year mortality, while PNI, CONUT, and MHR independently predicted ICU admission. Among all indices evaluated, CONUT demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for both outcomes. Conclusion: In patients with AIS, composite inflammatory and nutritional indices-particularly CONUT and MHR-provided valuable prognostic information. These markers, derived from routine laboratory tests, offer a practical and cost-effective method for early risk stratification and may help guide more personalized care pathways in stroke management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Utku et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: