Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines divisibility in international human rights, exploring implications for state practice and obligations.
The relevance of the study stems from the ongoing debate around the justifiability of the existence of two separate covenants in international human rights law: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). The subject of the article is the question of the divisibility or indivisibility of international human rights. The purpose of the paper is to analyse the reasons for the creation of two separate covenants and whether international human rights are divisible or indivisible. In addition, the study aims to examine how the formation of the two-covenant system affected state practice and international human rights obligations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhalgas Temirbekov (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: