September 18, 2025Law and State

Between Naturalism and Legal Interpretation: Modern Debates on the Nature of Legal Realism

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Legal realism highlights the role of social grounds in judicial decision-making, showing law is not purely rational.
The study identifies key arguments from legal realists arguing for a naturalized approach to legal epistemology.
Using analytical jurisprudence methods, including logical and linguistic analysis, the paper reconstructs existing debates.
This research emphasizes a need to rethink traditional views on legal realism and its implications for court practices.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

This analysis examines legal argumentation within legal realism, suggesting its social foundations. Insights into modern debates contribute to understanding legal epistemology.

Cite This Study

А. Б. Дидикин (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4764e31b076d99fa6e580 https://doi.org/10.51634/2307-5201_2024_4_54

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis examines legal argumentation within legal realism, suggesting its social foundations. Insights into modern debates contribute to understanding legal epistemology.

Between Naturalism and Legal Interpretation: Modern Debates on the Nature of Legal Realism

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Between Naturalism and Legal Interpretation: Modern Debates on the Nature of Legal Realism

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider