What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study (also classified as: Meta-Analysis).

September 20, 2025

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

AJAnila JaleelShalamar Hospital UAUmair AzizBahauddin Zakariya University GFGhulam FaridShalamar Hospital

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This systematic review compares the accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in medical licensing and residency exams, indicating ChatGPT-4 shows higher performance.

Key Points

ChatGPT-4 achieved 81.8% accuracy in medical licensing exams, significantly outperforming ChatGPT-3.5 at 60.8%.
A pooled risk ratio of 1.36 indicates ChatGPT-4 is 36% more likely to provide correct answers than ChatGPT-3.5.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 53 studies assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in medical examinations.
These findings highlight the necessity for future improvements to enhance AI's accuracy and utility in medical education.

Cite This Study

Jaleel et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4765531b076d99fa6e849 https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.68070

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This systematic review compares the accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in medical licensing and residency exams, indicating ChatGPT-4 shows higher performance.

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Evaluating the Potential and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 in Medical Licensing and In-Training Examinations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider