This analysis addresses the impact of political economy on co-operative laws in Africa, suggesting a path for legal harmonization.
The materialists conceptualize history within the context ofconflict relating to classes and socio-economic forces. Within history, co-operatives as socio-economic forces have played significant roles in the stages of developmentand have gained relevance in the class struggles that have ensued. Hence, co-operatives qualify as products and players in the dynamic and evolving Marxism versus capitalism struggles. As a result, co-operative laws are a reflection of the climax and anti-climax of class struggles, but in African’s case a body of defective legal framework is presented. These deficiencies currently constitute hindrances to the optimal utilization of some projected benefits from the harmonization of co-operative laws. With Nigeria as the primary case study,this work critically reviews extantliterature that problemitises the study, adoptingthe descriptive research methodology. The political economy of African co-operatives is appraised, with the following preliminary findings: African co-operatives have been impacted with variants of Marxism and capitalism through military and civil rules in the postcolonial era, both ideologies have influences on African co-operative laws, with capitalism having the better share, African co-operatives possess symptoms of peasant Marxism, but are regulated by laws highly influenced by imperial-capitalism, this ideological deficitis at the foundation of co-operative law in Africa. Although reviews and advancements are currently being attempted through the harmonization of co-operative legislations within the regions of Africa, regional frameworks have not been particularly successful on the continent. Therefore, an appraisal of the political economy of African co-operatives and its influences on co-operative laws is recommended as a primary remedial. Further, an apex international legal framework which addresses local peculiarities that influences such political economy, and by consequence sub-national and national co-operative legislations is recommended. A Universal Charter for Co-operative Societies fashioned after the Universal Charter on Human Rights 1948 is then proposed for further development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajibola Anthony Akanji (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: