Interpretation reveals a polymetron composed of iambic senarii and an elegiac distich.
I interpret the metric inscription on the stylus from the Bloomberg excavations in London (Tomlin 2018a, 5–6) as a polymetron that consists of two iambic senarii and an elegiac distich. In acul[eat]um, if this restoration is correct, -ea- must be scanned monosyllabically with synizesis. In lines 2–3 I punctuate before ut and after rogo, so that the ut clause depends on rogo. In line 4 I restore ut[i], which provides a hexameter: si fortuna daret quo possem largius uti! (si introduces a wish, like utinam). In the word that follows via the third letter must be identified as N (not as V); I suggest to restore either cen[a] (the ablative that is asyndetically coordinated with via) or Cen[i] (the vocative of Cenius). In either case via must be scanned monosyllabically with synizesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denis V. Keyer (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: