This review evaluates analytical approaches for cell and gene therapies, highlighting regulatory considerations and safety challenges.
Background: Cell and gene therapies (CGTs) are groundbreaking therapies for complex diseases, but must be underpinned by robust analytical approaches for safety, efficacy, and quality, as they are complex biologically. Aim: This review aims to evaluate analytical approaches to CGT development and quality control with a focus on emerging technologies, regulatory considerations, and standardization challenges. Methods: The literature was searched comprehensively. Analytical methods like flow cytometry, qPCR, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and mass spectrometry were considered along with emerging technologies like single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), microfluidics, and AI. Regulatory guidelines and standardization were also looked into. Results: Conventional methods like flow cytometry and qPCR provide good characterization and safety testing, while newer technologies, i.e., MS-based proteomics and AI-driven analytics, enhance precision and scalability. Standardized platforms, supported by NIST and public-private partnerships, form the basis of reproducibility. Challenges include raw material heterogeneity, scalability of high-throughput approaches, and regulatory harmonization. Multi-omics integration yields holistic perspectives but requires advanced bioinformatics. Conclusion: Standardized workflows, automation, AI, and multi-omics approaches are critical to surmount CGT development challenges, to ensure consistent quality and regulatory compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fatek et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: