Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study examines health financing and long-term care policies in several countries, suggesting improvements for Iran.
Context: The increase in life expectancy has resulted in a growing elderly population, presenting numerous challenges, particularly in the healthcare sector. Accordingly, this study aimed to adapt a health financing model for the aging population in Iran based on the experiences of selected countries of the world. Evidence Acquisition: This comparative study was conducted in 2025 to examine elderly care policies across selected countries. Using keywords such as “elderly”, “financing”, “health system”, “health services”, and “management”, targeted searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. English-language studies published up to 2025 and comparable to Iran’s elderly care system were included. Using the PRISMA guideline and health financing-based tool, 39 studies from seven countries focusing on insurance-based models were analyzed. Results: This study examined the policies and programs of Germany, Japan, China, South Korea, France, Ghana, India, and Iran concerning elderly care. It was revealed that long-term care (LTC) is a significant component of the healthcare strategies in all these countries, implemented through various approaches. Moreover, health systems in the studied countries are mainly financed by a combination of public and private health insurance. Conclusions: This study showed that Iran should prioritize creating long-term care insurance (LTCI) to secure sustainable funding for elderly healthcare, while also enhancing public-private partnerships and ensuring fair access to quality care for older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jahanpour et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: