PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 2025Nicotine & Tobacco Research4 citations

Cigarette Smoking with Serious Mental Illness: US Provider and Veteran Beliefs About How to Quit

View Full Paper
CKCorinne N. KacmarekETEliana J TrikeriotisRGRichard W. Goldberg

Key Points

  • Veterans exhibit high interest in quitting smoking, but low self-efficacy hampers progress.
  • 90% of veterans are contemplating quitting, yet provider attitudes negatively influence treatment continuity.
  • Interviews coded using the Theory of Planned Behavior reveal key themes in veterans' quitting attitudes.
  • Shared misconceptions among providers and veterans reinforce barriers to effective tobacco treatment.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Veterans with serious mental illness (SMI) have high cigarette smoking rates and want to quit, but mental health providers are often reluctant to treat smoking. This study compared how providers and veterans in a United States Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VA) SMI clinics view smoking and treatment. Methods 20 SMI providers and 20 veterans with SMI who smoked cigarettes were interviewed. A rapid evaluation matrix approach was used to code interviews based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (attitudes, self-efficacy, and norms). This paper focuses on themes identified in the attitudes and self-efficacy domains. Results Veterans had high interest in quitting smoking but low self-efficacy to quit. In regards to attitudes, veterans had specific beliefs about how and when to quit. Provider attitudes involved anticipating mixed interest in quitting among their veterans and anticipating low quit rates. Eighteen (90%) veterans were at least contemplating quitting. Many providers interpreted ambivalence about quitting as low readiness to quit and viewed the smoking/return-to-smoking cycle of addiction as an indicator that veterans with SMI could not quit. Veterans also believed they could not quit until they were “ready” or strong enough to do so, which impeded initiating smoking discussion with providers. Conclusion Providers and veterans share unhelpful attitudes about quitting smoking, which discouraged treatment and reinforced unhelpful attitudes. These qualitative findings shed light on the underlying mechanisms of infrequent tobacco treatment in mental health settings via the Theory of Planned Behavior to guide efforts to improve reach of tobacco treatment in these settings. Implications Comparing the perspectives of providers and veterans from the same setting is a rare contribution to tobacco treatment literature. Provider and veteran attitudes about quitting smoking interacted and led smoking to persist unaddressed despite veteran interest in quitting. Providers may benefit from education about how to effectively treat smoking to dispel myths that impede treatment and feel more comfortable integrating smoking treatment into routine care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kacmarek et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6c687b1249cec298b2a16https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper