Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This evaluation of self-compassion reveals a 4-factor structure in South Korean adults, suggesting cultural significance.
Despite its widespread therapeutic use, the evaluation of self-compassion remains controversial. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) was proposed with three components on a bipolar continuum, ranging from compassionate self-responding (CS), including self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness, to uncompassionate self-responding (UCS), including self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification. However, recent evidence conflicts with this 6-factor structure, particularly when considering cultural differences. We tested the cultural validity of the SCS in a South Korean sample by comparing 12 models of different factor structures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). The results support a 4-factor ESEM model (three CS factors and one UCS factor; all items were negatively valenced), consistent with previous findings in Northeast Asian populations. Incremental and criterion validity were confirmed. These findings suggest that the operationalization of self-compassion and its measurement should be culturally contextualized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: