Mixed-methods evaluation shows improved accuracy in technical translation and enhanced employability in food industry graduates.
This research fills the gap concerning the lack of translation experts in the food sector by creating and assessing a novel cooperative university-industry model of training guided by translation sociology and inters miotic theory. This model describes a comprehensive pedagogical scenario which includes cooperative curriculum design in food science, compliance documents, and cross-cultural promotion. Through collaboration between academic institutions and food industry enterprises, the curriculum was implemented. Mixed-methods evaluation using quantitative and qualitative performance metrics and stakeholder evaluation within three cohorts (total n=186) revealed substantial gains in accuracy of technical translation - in the post-training phase, participants made an average of 4.8 errors per 1000 words compared to a baseline of 23.4, alongside mastery of food terminology which rose to 91.7% post-training from a baseline of 43.2%, improvement in employment outcomes to a 96.8% placement rate compared to the industry average of 74.5%. The training model’s project-based approach supports interaction with a wide range of texts, including but not limited to technical documents and multicultural marketing essays, through active real-world-aligned multi-evaluator frameworks out of industry performance benchmarks. Results show revolutionary enhancement in graduate employability and accelerated professional competency development, reinforced industry-academia collaboration, with diminished gap between men and women across the field of technical translation. This establishes a replicable model geared towards specialized translator training deficiencies spanning multiple professions while promoting diverse representation in translation education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge Bai (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: