Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study assesses variability of MCA pulsatility index in fetal growth restriction, indicating reliability issues.
Purpose Evaluation of intra‐ and inter‐observer variability of middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) compared to normally grown controls and literature review. Methods Prospective observational cross‐sectional study. Singleton pregnancies between 26 and 40 weeks were included and divided into two groups based on fetal growth: fetal growth restricted and normally grown fetuses. Fetal growth restricted fetuses were divided into early and late FGR. Intra‐and inter‐observer variability were assessed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and interpreted following the TRUST criteria and GRRAS guidelines. Results One hundred and fifty patients were included in the study. Forty‐eight cases were complicated by FGR: 27 early‐onset and 21 late‐onset. 13/48 (27%) showed middle cerebral artery redistribution. Intra and interobserver reproducibility were “poor” in the appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses. In the FGR group, the intraobserver reproducibility was “moderate” and interobserver reproducibility was “moderate/poor”. Intraobserver reproducibility was “good” in early FGR and “moderate” in late FGR cases, while interobserver reproducibility was “moderate” in early FGR and “poor” in late FGR cases. Conclusion MCA PI Doppler repeatability is superior in FGR fetuses compared to AGA fetuses. MCA pulsatility index can be used with confidence in FGR, especially if early onset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: