Survey highlights attitudes towards misleading questions in teaching, suggesting benefits for critical thinking skills.
This paper investigates the attitudes of the university mathematics lecturers towards the use of deliberately misleading mathematics questions in teaching and assessment as a pedagogical strategy with their students. The intention of using such questions is to enhance students’ critical thinking. Critical thinking is understood here as “examining, questioning, evaluating, and challenging taken-for-granted assumptions about issues and practices” as defined by the New Zealand Ministry of Education. The study is based on a survey of university lecturers who have been introduced to the suggested pedagogical strategy. Their attitudes are compared with the attitudes of secondary school mathematics teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sergiy Klymchuk (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: