Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Action research reveals digitalisation disrupts institutional logics in social enterprises, indicating internal tensions.
This article draws on theories of hybridity in social entrepreneurship, institutional logics, and technology-associated organisational change to develop a novel framework for analysing how digitalisation affects hybridity and internal tensions in social enterprises. Based on an action research study in a UK-based social enterprise, our findings reveal that digitalisation functions as a set of new strategic practices that disrupt existing institutional logics and trigger profound organisational changes. This form of institutional disruption destabilises established hybrid balances. These dynamics generate internal tensions – rooted in divergent digital literacies, competing mission recognition, and identity misalignments – which ultimately lead to resistance and the marginalisation of digitalisation. Our study advances understanding of digitalisation as a contested and complex socio-technical process in social enterprises and highlights its often-overlooked ‘dark side’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: