Evaluating LLMs on microservice-based applications: how complex is your specification?

In this paper we evaluate how far LLMs have advanced in generating code for real-world problems. Specifically, we explore code synthesis for microservice-based applications, a widely used architecture pattern. We define a standard template for specifying these applications, and we propose a metric for judging the difficulty level of a specification. The higher the score, the more difficult it is to generate code for the specification. We develop a framework to automate the process of testing LLM-synthesized code for a microservice using unit tests. Our experimental results show that strong LLMs (like GPT-3o-mini) do fairly well on medium difficulty specifications but do very poorly on those of higher difficulty levels. This is due to more intricate business logic, a greater use of external services, database integration and inclusion of non-functional capabilities such as authentication. We analyzed the errors in LLM-synthesized code and report on the key challenges LLMs face in generating code for these specifications thereby suggesting future research directions to improve code synthesis for real-world problems.