Systematic review reveals longer inter-set rest intervals improve strength but have minimal effects on hypertrophy.
Background: Inter-set rest intervals (ISR) influence resistance training adaptations. Shorter intervals (<60s) promote metabolic stress, while longer intervals (>60s) are thought to enhance recovery, mechanical tension, and strength. Aim: This review examined the effects of <60s vs. >60s ISR on hypertrophy, strength, and secondary outcomes in resistance-trained males. Methods: Six studies were included, assessing hypertrophy, strength, motor unit recruitment, power, and hormones. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and forest plots were used. Results: Longer ISRs provided small improvements in hypertrophy (SMD = 0.08) and strength (SMD = -0.74). Hormonal and power outcomes were inconsistent. Conclusion: Longer ISRs slightly improve strength but show minimal advantage for hypertrophy, highlighting the need for further study in trained populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: