Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis shows increased bowling velocity and shoulder strength in male fast bowlers, suggesting combined resistance training enhances performance.
Abstract Background Pace bowling in cricket demands precise neuromuscular coordination, muscular strength, and timing to optimize ball velocity and accuracy. Shoulder strength and lower-limb power are key determinants, yet evidence for multi-modal combined resistance training (CRT) in club-level fast bowlers is limited. Objective To examine the effects of a six-week CRT program on shoulder force, bowling velocity, and accuracy in club-level male fast bowlers. Methods Thirty-five male fast bowlers (mean age 25.4 ± 2.1 years) were randomized to CRT (n = 18) or traditional training (TR, n = 17). CRT involved resistance, plyometric, and weighted ball exercises. Bowling velocity, shoulder strength, countermovement jump (CMJ), and bowling accuracy were measured. Paired and independent t-tests, effect sizes (Hedge’s g), Pearson correlation, and post-hoc power analysis were used. Results CRT significantly increased bowling velocity (115.83 ± 4.84 → 120.31 ± 4.83 km/h; g = 1.42, p < .001) and shoulder force (312.01 ± 19.89 → 339.08 ± 20.36 N; g = 1.36, p < .001). Bowling accuracy improved moderately (+ 6.8%, g = 0.92, p < .001), while CMJ remained unchanged. Shoulder force strongly correlated with bowling velocity (r = 0.81, p < .001). Post-hoc power was adequate for velocity (0.98), shoulder force (0.97), and accuracy (0.88). Conclusion Six-week CRT effectively enhanced shoulder force and bowling velocity, with moderate accuracy gains in club-level fast bowlers. CRT is a practical, evidence-based approach for amateur cricketers, supporting neuromuscular and functional performance improvements. Coaches should consider CRT integration to optimize pace bowling performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hossain et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: