Retrospective cohort study found zinc deficiency predicts diabetic kidney disease and mortality in T2DM, suggesting need for risk stratification.
Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health challenge, with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) representing one of its most serious complications. Although zinc deficiency is common in diabetes, large-scale clinical evidence on its role as a predictor of new-onset DKD is limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Analytics Network Platform to analyze patients aged ≥18 years who underwent zinc testing (2010–2023). Patients were classified into zinc deficiency (serum zinc <70 μg/dL) and control groups (70–120 μg/dL). After 1:1 propensity score matching, we analyzed the risk of new-onset DKD at two-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes included the risks of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%), and ophthalmic complications. Results The final matched cohort included 20,470 patients (10,235 per group) with a mean age of 54 years. Zinc deficiency was associated with a 42% increased risk of new-onset DKD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–1.68, p < 0.001). Additional significant associations included all-cause mortality (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.40–1.95, p < 0.001), AKI (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27–1.69, p < 0.001), and CKD development (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.37, p = 0.028). No significant associations were observed with poor glycemic control or ophthalmic complications. Subgroup analyses showed stronger associations in patients with diabetes duration <5 years (HR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.35–2.02, p < 0.001). Conclusion Zinc deficiency is an independent predictor of new-onset DKD and adverse outcomes in T2DM, particularly in early disease. These findings support zinc deficiency as a potential biomarker for risk stratification and highlight the need for prospective studies to evaluate whether zinc supplementation can reduce risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: